Message to CNN, MSNBC, FOX, ABC, NBC, and CBS

I have one message to Joe, Sean, Pat, Nora, Soledad, Chris, Campbell, Wolf, and the other “commentators” covering the Democratic convention:

SHUT THE *UCK UP!!!!

Please, stop hurting the country with your concern troll, faux “objective” analysis of the speeches and events at the convention. We don’t care what YOU think or care what you want us to think. We KNOW what the GOP thinks, we don’t need to see them on the air repeating the talking points, in fact we don’t need YOU repeating the GOP talking points.

Here is how basic journalism at a political convention is suppose to work (if you need help call Walter Cronkite):

1. Show the speech without comments.

2. After the speech, talk about the points made – are they based in reality – are they truthful. If a speaker comments about the opponent then talk about it and compare it on the known facts. Don’t put words in the speaker’s mouth or speculate why something was said – stick to what was said.

3. If you didn’t like a speech then say why based on objective rational reasons – not talking points from the other party.

4. Talk to actual people attending the convention to find out how the different speeches played out. The speeches aren’t for YOU. They are for those spending the week at the convention.

If you feel like I do, that the “commentors” plain suck, then watch the convention unfiltered and uninterrupted on C-SPAN.

*Update* Exceptions to this request include Rachel Maddow, Chuck Todd, and some of Keith Olberman (he can get close to gimble lock at times). Also PBS is good viewing and the Daily Show and Colbert Report have done a good job so far…..

Can’t we all just get along

After reading some left leaning blogs this primary campaign season, you kind of have to remind yourself that people don’t all think alike. You don’t want to draw some false conclusions that paint everyone in a particular group with too wide a brush. It has been pretty tough for me to read those blogs.

The stars seem to be aligning for the Democrats in 2008. They have two history making candidates wanting to be the next President, a current President whose approval rating puts him in league with some nasty people like Nixon and Hitler, and some of the largest turn outs for a primary in decades.

It all seems good so what is the problem?

At least from a blog perspective the problem is too much of a good thing and internal strife is threatening to sour people on the whole mess.

What do I mean?

Well I expected to see and read negative stories and treatment of Hillary Clinton in the mainstream press (MSM) since that has been their bread and butter since the Clinton administration. From “stories” about her pantsuits to repeating invectives as news, the MSM has shown no love for Hillary.

I just didn’t expect to read those negative stories in left leaning blogs like Daily Kos as well as local the Buckeye State Blog.

Just today 2/29/2008, there were three negative Hillary stories on the front page of Daily Kos. Clinton allies threaten “imminent” lawsuit over Texas caucuses and The Dog That Hasn’t Barked and Ickes and Penn, After School, Behind the Bike Racks

On Buckeye State it had Ted Steps In With The Hail Marry Clinton Ad, Toledo Blade Loves That Obama Guy and Note To The Clinton Campaign on its front page today.

And don’t get me started on some of the comments to articles on those blogs. One would think you came across a right wing blog with all the b and c words used about Hillary and the Clinton’s in general and watch out if you try to post a negative Obama story or comment.

I get it. I know that these blogs and the regular contributors have taken sides. I know they don’t write in the subtle manner of the conservative loving MSM. I understand that some people are very passionate and have put in many hours of labor and love to promote their candidate. What bothers me is the personal attacks.

Sure complain about the person’s views or previous votes but stop with the personal attacks. Stop with the irrelevant look at campaign tactics and strategy. Both candidates are going to do everything to win. Just because you don’t like a particular candidate doesn’t make their tactic any better or worse. I need to point out that Bill Clinton was popular and won reelection because he out Republicaned the GOP and took the Democrats to the center. John Kerry, in 2004, stayed with the Northeastern liberal elites and lost.

And what does that say about those readers and writers who take right wing talking points that have been used in the past and pass them off as proof that Hillary is no good yet dismiss talking points that paint Obama in a negative light.

It has come to the point that I have practically stopped reading those blogs. I skim the titles and skip about 80%. I still read Cheers and Jeers on Daily Kos.

This year it looks like no matter who is the Democratic candidate this will be the year for change in the White House. My fear is these inter-family squabbles might upset the apple cart and the Democrats will miss out again like they did in 2000.

Tom Brokaw on the Charlie Rose Show

I watched a bit of Tom Brokaw on the Charlie Rose show tonight talking about his book “The Sixites” and the History Channel documentry on 1968 specifically (which was a good show – nothing about UFOs thank goodness)

The following is a quote from that interview. I liked it because it sums up my philosophy and infuses my Humanism:

The big political lesson [of the sixties] was that you got to have a clearly established goals, that you can’t be hostage to political correctness, that you have to examine situations on their merit, and that the solution may come from the right – and that’s okay, or it may come from the left – and that’s okay, as long as we continue to move in that direction. And that does not mean you have to sacrifice your personal ideology.

Tom Brokaw on the Charlie Rose show 12/10/2007

Supporting the striking writers of the WGA

On November 13th, this blog and the blogs listed below will be on strike for the day in solidarity with the Writers Guild of America. As fellow writers and as TV fans, we are coming together to express our strong support for the writers and their goals. We believe that when a writer’s work makes money for a company, that writer deserves to be paid.

Many writers depend on residuals for a stable income, and that income shouldn’t be based on an outdated formula which ignores the existence of new media and all but a tiny percentage of DVD sales. The talented writers responsible for so much of what we love about television should and must be paid fairly and equitably, and we will stand with them until they reach that goal. For everyone’s sake, and for the sake of television, we hope both sides can come to an agreement quickly.

To further that goal, we are calling on our readers to sign this petition and to contact the following television networks, voicing support for the writers and for a return to the negotiating table:

ABC
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank, CA 91521
(818) 460-7777

FOX
10201 W. Pico Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90035
(310) 369-1000

CBS
7800 Beverly Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90036
(323) 575-2345

NBC / Universal
100 Universal City Plaza
Universal City, CA 91608
(818) 777-1000

After the blackout, we intend to continue our campaign to support the WGA until the dispute has been resolved fairly. Since we will not be posting any new content on the 13th, we encourage our readers to visit United Hollywood instead for frequent updates about the strike.

In solidarity-

The CineManiac
Daemon’s TV
Ducky Does TV
Gabby Babble
Give Me My Remote
Glowy Box
I am a TV Junkie
The Media Pundit
Mikey Likes TV
Pass the Remote
The Pie Maker
Ramblings of a TV Whore
Seriously? OMG! WTF?
Silly Pipe Dreams
Tapeworthy
Televisionary
TiFaux
Tube Talk
The TV Addict
TV Series Finale
Watch with Intelligence

*As a side note* – When media content is seen on the Internet and the writers don’t get paid it is called promotional, but if media content is seen on the Internet and the studios don’t get paid it is called piracy. Is there really a difference??

Thoughts on the Findlay Mayoral Forum

I posted on 10/24 about the recent Findlay Mayoral Forum that was held at University of Findlay on 10/22. It was broadcast on WFIN, WLFC, and UF-TV 20. At the time of my post I had not had a chance to see or hear the event and said I would get back to you. Well, I’m back.

General thoughts: I did find more to the event than what was printed about it the Courier. Both candidates, Democrat Tom Knopf and Republican Pete Sehnert did a good job of presenting their ideas in front of the glare of television lights and cameras. Although it wasn’t a debate, I thought Knopf did a better job. When he answered the questions he gave specific examples to back up is overall idea.

I also need to correct my initial thought that I posted earlier:

I was a bit disappointed – based on the The Courier write up of the event – to read that Knopf wasn’t sure if more low cost housing was needed in the city.

Tom sent me a comment telling me to see the forum so I could see he hadn’t changed his position. He was right. He was the only one who had specific idea for the issue of low cost housing.

Knopf said he would like to see:

…more true actual low cost housing that will benefit those who aren’t able to pay 4, 5 , or $600 for a small 2 bedroom apartment.

Sehnert was the one who really didn’t seem to know if low cost housing was an issue or not. He explained that there was a lot of housing available and a lot of apartment stock. He didn’t address the issue of affordability directly.

I also liked Knopf directly saying that the Findlay Town Center project shouldn’t go forward unless and until the flooding issue is resolved first. He also wanted to see the empty store fronts downtown filled in and other non-flood plain areas considered for development before committing $90 million dollars on more retail space.

Flag City Politico has video segments posted of the entire forum. WFIN has audio of the forum available as well.

Pete Sehnert’s website

Tom Knopf’s website

Don’t forget to vote on November 6th