Troops in Iraq are not “heroes”

14 Marines from a unit based in Ohio died when a roadside bomb went off in Iraq on Wednesday August 3rd.

It is sad for the families of the fallen Marines but since Wednesday our local media have not stopped talking about the deaths. I have seen several parents interviewed, people putting flowers at a make shift memorial, and now the Governor has called for a day of mourning on August 8th.

Having lost my Dad in Vietnam back in 1968, I understand what they are going through but I am disturbed by the relentless media coverage about the recent deaths. It just seems creepy that people think they need to grieve with the families in a public way.

This isn’t the first time the local media here in Ohio has given coverage of an Iraq war death. It seems every week there is another video package of parents talking about their child or a husband who has been killed. It has happened so often that I am numb to it. That’s why with the deaths on Wednesday, I really don’t feel anything beyond sadness for the families. I am not mourning nor do I need to mourn.

It may have something to do with my feelings about the troops in Iraq. I don’t believe they should be there.

Our Governor, in his call for mourning said “All citizens of Ohio should pause and remember all of those heroes who have sacrificed their lives and those who are currently fighting to defend our freedom…”

I don’t see the troops as heroes and they aren’t defending my freedom. They are doing a job. They are executing a political plan to install democracy in a region that has no history of democracy. They were sent there based on a lie. To me all the troops there are victims. They are victims of a crass and arrogant civil authority who never had a plan except for their fantasy idea of what would happen.

That’s maybe why I don’t feel anything else when there are reports of another child or father or mother dying in Iraq. Death just seems like another outcome from a failed policy by leaders who should know better.

We have seen this all before. My Dad’s name is engraved on black granite in Washington as a monument to another arrogant administration who also had fantasy notions of how another country should be run.

Losing a child or father or mother in a war is hell. It never seems to get better even with time. They are gone and will never and can never come back.

That’s why sending troops into battle should be the very last resort. It is not fast or easy. It isn’t a video game. Troops are real people with real lives and have more living to do.

Each death tears apart another family and is never something that should be entered into lightly.

Democrats: We like anal lube. Really.

Once again the Democrats bent over and became spokespeople for anal lube:

Senators Avert Showdown Over Filibusters

By DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent

Under the terms, Democrats agreed to allow final confirmation votes for Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown and William Pryor, appeals court nominees they have long blocked. There is “no commitment to vote for or against” the filibuster against two other conservatives named to the appeals court, Henry Saad and William Myers.

The agreement said future judicial nominees should “only be filibustered under extraordinary circumstances,” with each senator � presumably the Democrats � holding the discretion to decide when those conditions had been met. Officials said the pact was intended to cover the Supreme Court as well as other levels of the judiciary.

http://tinyurl.com/bj26z

What this means is the Dems lose the fight over the most contentious nominees and gained a “maybe” the Republicans won’t drop the bomb on the filibuster in the future.

If I was the Democratic leader I would have dared them to do it and when they did make sure the Dems never voted on another piece of legislation for the rest of the term. Instead of Yay or Nay each one would be asked to vote “present”.

That way when the elections came around the Dems could say we stood up for our party and the Republicans are responsible for every thing passed that term.

Now once again the spines are no where to be found.

If find any please send them to the DNC, 430 S. Capitol St. SE Washington, DC 20003

How did Bush win Ohio in 2004?

On May 15th, 2005, the Columbus Dispatch published a detailed analysis of the vote that day based on information from the Secretary of State’s office.

It shows that while Kerry won the major cities, except Cincinnati, Bush and the GOP crushed Kerry in the rural areas. They did it by a massive get-to-the-polls push in the 3 days before the election. The GOP targeted likely Bush voters using marketing data.

The other points found that led to the Bush victory in November: it was the first presidential election since the Sept. 11 terrorist attack, the country was at “war”, Bush had a unique relationship with religious conservatives, and state Issue 1 was on the Ohio ballot (banning Gay marriage).

I put together a couple of the articles and the graphs on a mini-site for those interested in reading more:

https://dougberger.net/ohio2004/index.html

A Level 3 snow emergency, doesn’t necessarily mean employees must stay home

action shot of a snow plow

I live in Ohio. We have winters with snow storms and ice. We also have what are known as Snow Emergencies.

Basically, law enforcement officials in the various counties can issue Snow Emergencies to protect the public and help in the clearing of roads during and after a storm hits.

Continue reading “A Level 3 snow emergency, doesn’t necessarily mean employees must stay home”

“Rathergate” still doesn’t change the facts

Okay, let me get this straight.

An “independent” investigation of the 60 Minutes September 2004 report on discrepancies in President Bush’s National Guard service record cost the jobs of 4 CBS staffers. Senior vice president Betsy West, 60 Minutes executive producer Josh Howard and senior broadcast producer Mary Murphy have all been asked to resign. Producer Mary Mapes was dismissed for what was called a “Myopic zeal” in reporting the story based on documents that may have been forged.

Yet the investigation could not state conclusively whether the documents were forgeries or not. The report also found no evidence that political bias was a factor in the network’s journalism.

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/cbs-memogate.html

The secretary for the General who’s signature appeared on the documents said the documents weren’t real BUT the information contained in them was correct.

http://www.fair.org/activism/cbs-memos-knox.html

Also the same discrepancies were reported by different news organizations during the same period of time (September 2004) using different sources.

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/cbs-bush-documents.html

Meanwhile, the stories reported in the New York Times prior to the invasion of Iraq that said there were Weapons of Mass Destruction caused not even a whimper of outrage. Even after the Times admitted the reporting was “insufficiently qualified or allowed to stand unchallenged,” the reporter who wrote the stories still works of the paper and reports on Iraq.

So as FAIR comments: it does matter who you piss off rather than what the truth is.

http://www.fair.org/press-releases/cbs-memogate.html

Ironically, the information in the “fake” memos has been reported as not true – which is not the case. Once again the President gets a pass.

Sad.